How Does Gymshark Compare to Lululemon?

If you’re into fitness apparel, you’ve probably wondered —
how does Gymshark compare to Lululemon?

As someone who works in activewear manufacturing and product development at FuKi Gymwear,
I’ve studied both brands closely — from fabrics and fit to price and audience.
Here’s a full comparison to help you decide which brand fits your training goals, lifestyle, and budget.


Table of Contents


Quick Answer

Lululemon is known for premium, long-lasting activewear with a luxury lifestyle appeal.
Gymshark, on the other hand, focuses on affordable, performance-driven fitness apparel for younger, gym-focused audiences.

Brand Ideal For
Gymshark Gym training, performance, affordability
Lululemon Yoga, everyday wear, premium comfort

gymshark vs lululemon

💬 In short: Gymshark is for athletes chasing performance, while Lululemon is for those seeking comfort and quality.


Overview: Gymshark vs Lululemon

Feature Gymshark Lululemon
Founded 2012 (UK) 1998 (Canada)
Focus Gym & training performance Yoga, lifestyle, premium athleisure
Audience Gen Z & Millennials Professionals & lifestyle users
Style Trendy, body-sculpting Minimal, timeless
Sustainability Moderate High
Durability 1–2 years 3–5 years

1. Brand Backgrounds

Gymshark started in the UK as a small fitness apparel brand by Ben Francis,
growing rapidly through influencer marketing and social media.
It’s now a global performance wear brand focused on gym aesthetics, compression fits, and affordability.

Lululemon, founded in Canada, took the opposite approach —
building a reputation for luxury yoga wear and expanding into men’s training and lifestyle products.

🧵 From a manufacturing standpoint, Lululemon’s quality control is far more rigorous,
while Gymshark wins in trend responsiveness and community-driven design.


2. Target Market

Brand Target Audience Core Focus
Gymshark Ages 18–30 Gym training, influencer style
Lululemon Ages 25–45 Yoga, lifestyle, professional wear

Gymshark appeals to young, fitness-focused consumers, often buying based on Instagram trends.
Lululemon targets older, established consumers willing to pay for durability and brand prestige.


3. Fit and Design Philosophy

Gymshark specializes in form-fitting, performance-enhancing styles — think compressive leggings and contour seams.
Their collections emphasize muscle definition and workout motivation.

Lululemon focuses on functionality and comfort. Their leggings and tops are
engineered for flexibility, breathability, and minimal seams — perfect for yoga or daily wear.

💡 If you love sleek, sculpting fits — choose Gymshark.
If you want buttery-soft, lasting comfort — go with Lululemon.


4. Fabric Technology

Brand Fabric Technology Key Features
Gymshark Adapt, Vital Seamless, Energy+ Stretch, contour, compression
Lululemon Nulu, Everlux, Luxtreme Buttery soft, sweat-wicking, breathable

From my experience as a manufacturer, Lululemon invests more heavily in proprietary fabrics
while Gymshark optimizes existing textiles for affordable performance.


5. Price Comparison

Product Type Gymshark Lululemon
Leggings $50–$70 $90–$128
Sports Bras $35–$55 $60–$78
Tops $30–$60 $70–$100
Joggers $60–$80 $110–$140

gymshark vs lululemon

Gymshark delivers strong value for the price —
but Lululemon’s higher cost reflects premium fabrics and longer lifespan.


6. Sustainability & Quality

Lululemon has made major sustainability strides:

  • Uses recycled nylon and polyester
  • Focuses on long-lasting wear to reduce waste
  • Certified B Corp-level transparency

Gymshark, while improving, still relies on synthetic materials and overseas production.
It’s more focused on accessibility than environmental impact.

If sustainability and longevity matter, Lululemon leads.
If affordability and frequent new drops matter, Gymshark wins.


7. Which Brand Is Right for You?

Preference Best Brand
Budget-friendly, trendy gymwear Gymshark
Durable, premium-quality leggings Lululemon
Sustainable and ethical sourcing Lululemon
Sculpting compression fit Gymshark
All-day wear comfort Lululemon

🧭 Choose Gymshark if you train hard and want bold, functional style.
Choose Lululemon if you value fabric innovation and timeless luxury.


Comparison Table: Gymshark vs Lululemon

Category Gymshark Lululemon
Style Trendy & bold Minimalist & premium
Comfort Medium Excellent
Durability 1–2 years 3–5 years
Sustainability Moderate High
Fit Tight, sculpting Relaxed, smooth
Brand Appeal Youthful, influencer-led Established, lifestyle-led

FAQs

Q1: Is Gymshark better than Lululemon?
A: Gymshark is more affordable and gym-focused, while Lululemon offers superior quality and comfort.

Q2: Which lasts longer, Gymshark or Lululemon?
A: Lululemon typically lasts 2–3 times longer with proper care.

Q3: Are Gymshark leggings squat-proof?
A: Most are, especially in the Vital Seamless collection.

Q4: Which brand is more sustainable?
A: Lululemon — it uses recycled fabrics and publishes environmental reports.


Create a Competitive Activewear Brand with FuKi Gymwear

Inspired by brands like Gymshark and Lululemon?
At FuKi Gymwear, we help you bring your own fitness brand to life.

We offer:

  • OEM & ODM manufacturing for gymwear, yoga wear, and athleisure
  • Eco-friendly fabric options (recycled polyester, bamboo, Tencel)
  • Custom logo, packaging, and label design
  • Low MOQ production ideal for startups
  • Worldwide delivery to the U.S., Europe, and Australia

With FuKi Gymwear, you can build a sustainable, performance-driven brand
that combines Gymshark’s energy with Lululemon’s craftsmanship.


owen

Hi there! My name is Owen, I’m the father and hero of two wonderful children, with over 20 years of experience in apparel, from the factory floor to running my own successful apparel manufacturing business. I’m here to share with you what I’ve learned – let’s grow together!

Stay Ahead in Custom Gym Wear Trends!

Free samples are only offered to verified brands and established businesses. Please include your brand name and website for review.