As someone who works directly with footwear OEM teams and performance-testing labs, I get asked this all the time:
“Are On Running shoes actually worth the higher price?”
Here’s a clear, beginner-friendly explanation — based on fit testing, foam analysis, and comparisons with Nike and Hoka.
Yes — On Running is worth the price for runners who want a firm, technical, and efficient ride.
Their shoes feel different from soft-foam trainers because they’re engineered for responsiveness, not plush comfort.
If you prefer cushion-heavy shoes (like Hoka), On may feel too firm.
If you prefer an energetic, forward-moving ride, On excels.
External references:
From OEM testing, On’s pricing comes from three engineering factors:
Each “cloud” pod is individually molded, which raises tooling and production cost.
A full-length polymer plate that improves propulsion but increases manufacturing complexity.
Engineered mesh, recycled synthetics, and tighter QC standards add cost.
On maintains stricter tolerances for weight, flexibility, and impact consistency.
In short: higher precision = higher cost.
On is designed for forward energy, not softness.
The shoes stay surprisingly light despite their structure.
CloudTec pods resist compression better than standard EVA.
Great for hot climates and everyday wear.
Many people buy On for versatility — they feel like performance shoes but look casual.
| Brand | Cushioning Style | Ride Feel | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| On Running | CloudTec + Speedboard | Firm, responsive | Daily runs, lifestyle wear |
| Nike | ZoomX / React | Soft + bouncy | Speed, energy return |
| Hoka | Max cushion | Plush, soft | Long-distance comfort |
On = efficiency + firmness
Nike = bounce + speed
Hoka = softness + long mileage
Q1: Are On Cloud shoes good for long distances?
Yes, but only if you prefer a firm ride. Many marathoners still choose softer foams.
Q2: Do On Running shoes last long?
Yes — CloudTec pods maintain shape well over time.
Q3: Are On shoes good for beginners?
If you like structure, yes. If you want softness, consider Hoka.