Why Does Gymshark Have a Bad Reputation?

Gymshark is one of the most popular gymwear brands worldwide — loved for its sleek designs, influencer marketing, and body-sculpting fits.
But if you’ve read online reviews, you’ve likely seen mixed opinions and questions like:
“Why does Gymshark have a bad reputation?”

As someone who works in activewear manufacturing and brand development at FuKi Gymwear,
I’ve analyzed Gymshark’s brand journey from the factory floor to the global market.
Here’s an honest, SEO-optimized breakdown of what caused its early reputation issues and how it has improved.


Table of Contents


Quick Answer

Gymshark’s early bad reputation came mainly from:

  1. Inconsistent quality in early product lines
  2. Customer service and shipping delays during its viral growth phase
  3. Over-marketed influencer culture that felt inauthentic to some buyers

Today, Gymshark has improved its materials, logistics, and inclusivity, making it one of the most recognizable and evolving fitness brands globally.


1. Where Gymshark’s Reputation Issues Began

Gymshark started in 2012 as a small UK startup run by Ben Francis.
The brand grew explosively thanks to influencer partnerships, but production couldn’t keep up with demand.

That led to:

  • Stock shortages
  • Shipping delays
  • Varying product quality

🧵 From a manufacturing perspective, Gymshark used multiple suppliers in its early years — a common cause of inconsistent fit and fabric performance.


2. Common Complaints About Gymshark

Category Main Complaint Root Cause
Quality Leggings too thin or see-through Early fabric sourcing issues
Fit Runs small or inconsistent Unstandardized size grading
Customer Service Slow replies or lost orders Scaling faster than operations
Brand Image Over-edited influencer culture Perceived lack of authenticity

While most of these issues have improved, older online reviews still influence public perception.


3. Fabric and Durability Concerns

Early Gymshark collections such as Vital Seamless and Energy+ faced criticism for:

  • Light compression and thin fabric
  • Pilling or fading after frequent washing
  • Waistbands losing elasticity

Today, Gymshark uses heavier, stretch-resistant fabrics and more consistent stitching.
Still, compared to high-end brands like Lululemon or Vuori, its durability sits in the mid-range.


4. Customer Service & Shipping Problems

Between 2018 and 2021, Gymshark struggled with:

  • 2–4 week international shipping times
  • Delayed refunds
  • Minimal customer support channels

Now the brand operates regional warehouses in the UK, U.S., and EU, improving delivery times to under a week in most markets.


5. Influencer Marketing Controversy

Gymshark pioneered the fitness influencer model, collaborating with top YouTubers and Instagram athletes.
However, it received backlash for:

  • Over-polished, unrealistic marketing
  • Lack of body diversity early on

Since 2022, the brand has shifted to more inclusive and authentic campaigns, showcasing real athletes and everyday fitness enthusiasts.

💬 At FuKi Gymwear, we often advise new brands to balance aspirational visuals with relatable authenticity — exactly what Gymshark learned to do.


6. Has Gymshark Improved?

Yes — significantly.

Better quality control with new material blends
Faster shipping from expanded fulfillment centers
More inclusive marketing featuring all body types
Sustainability steps, including recycled fabrics

While Gymshark once had growing pains, it’s now regarded as a respected mid-premium performance brand.


Price & Reputation Comparison

Brand Reputation Average Price Range (USD) Strengths Weaknesses
Gymshark Improving $40 – $90 Stylish, community-driven, affordable Earlier QC and sizing issues
Lululemon Excellent $80 – $150 Premium fabrics, superior durability Higher prices
Alo Yoga High $70 – $160 Luxury athleisure, influencer appeal Expensive for casual users
Vuori High $70 – $130 Sustainable comfort, minimal design Limited product range
FuKi Gymwear (OEM) Customizable Flexible (MOQ-based) Private-label manufacturing, custom fits Requires brand setup

🧩 Gymshark’s path shows how fast-growing brands can recover from early issues through better quality control and transparency.


FAQs

Q1: Why does Gymshark have a bad reputation?
A: Mostly due to early quality inconsistencies, slow service, and influencer-driven marketing.

Q2: Has Gymshark fixed these issues?
A: Yes — newer collections use stronger fabrics and upgraded logistics.

Q3: Is Gymshark good quality now?
A: It’s mid-premium: better than fast fashion, below luxury brands like Lululemon.

Q4: Is Gymshark sustainable?
A: The brand has started using recycled fabrics but isn’t fully sustainable yet.


Build a Trusted Activewear Brand with FuKi Gymwear

If you’re inspired by Gymshark’s success but want to build a brand with consistent quality and strong reputation from day one,
partner with FuKi Gymwear — a professional OEM/ODM manufacturer for global activewear brands.

We provide:

  • OEM & ODM manufacturing for gymwear, yoga, and streetwear lines
  • Premium eco-friendly fabrics (recycled polyester, bamboo, spandex)
  • Custom logo, packaging, and label solutions
  • Low MOQ production ideal for startups
  • Worldwide delivery to the U.S., EU, and Australia

FuKi Gymwear helps you avoid common production pitfalls
and build a brand trusted for performance, sustainability, and craftsmanship.


owen@bless-dg.com

Recent Posts

Are Manduka Mats Heavy?

If you’ve ever …

18 小时 ago

Which Yoga Mat Is Better, Lululemon or Manduka?

If you’re searc…

18 小时 ago

What Is Manduka Known For?

If you’ve ever …

18 小时 ago

Is Liforme Better Than Manduka?

If you’ve been …

19 小时 ago

Is Manduka a German Brand?

If you’ve pract…

19 小时 ago

What Is Bo+Tee?

If you’ve been …

1 天 ago