As someone who works directly with OEM factories that produce performance apparel for global sports brands, I often get asked:
“Is Under Armour actually good quality?”
The short answer: Yes — Under Armour offers solid performance quality, especially for training, compression, and moisture-wicking gear.
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly breakdown.
Yes — Under Armour is good quality, especially for:
UA’s quality comes from technical fabrics, sturdy construction, and athlete-focused design.
External references:
From my OEM factory experience, these are the real reasons UA performs well:
UA became famous for its HeatGear and Tech fabrics — quick-drying and ideal for sweat-heavy workouts.
Gym gear undergoes pulling, stretching, abrasion.
UA uses:
You get premium feel without premium pricing (compared to Nike or Lululemon).
UA excels in:
UA’s quality comes from functional engineering, not just fabric softness.
| Brand | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Under Armour | Sweat-management, durability, compression gear | Not as stylish as Nike |
| Nike | Design, innovation, running tech | Higher pricing |
| Adidas | Lifestyle + sports balance | Less compression strength |
| Lululemon | Premium fabrics, yoga comfort | Most expensive |
UA = performance value
Nike/Lulu = premium & fashion
Adidas = balanced
Building your own activewear brand?
👉 https://fukigymwear.com
Q1: Does Under Armour last long?
Yes — UA is known for durability, especially for gym and compression gear.
Q2: Is UA better than Nike?
For value and gym performance, sometimes. For running or design, Nike leads.
Q3: Are Under Armour shirts good for sweating?
Yes. HeatGear and Tech fabrics wick moisture extremely well.
Q4: Is UA worth the price?
Yes — good durability and performance at mid-range cost.