As someone who works closely with performance-footwear factories and tests midsoles with athlete groups, I get this question constantly:
“Are On Running shoes actually better than Nike for running?”
Here is a simple, unbiased, beginner-friendly guide comparing cushioning, ride feel, durability, and which brand fits your training style best.
On Running is better for runners who want a firm, stable, responsive ride, especially for daily runs and mixed training.
Nike is better for runners who want maximum softness and speed-oriented energy return, especially for tempo runs and races.
Both brands are strong—but they feel entirely different underfoot.
External sources:
| Category | On Running | Nike |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning Feel | Firm–responsive | Soft–bouncy |
| Technology | CloudTec + Speedboard | ZoomX, React, Air |
| Best For | Everyday runs, stability | Speed, racing, softer landings |
| Durability | High outsole longevity | Varies by model (ZoomX wears faster) |
| Fit | Narrow–medium | Medium–narrow |
Takeaway:
On = structure + responsiveness
Nike = softness + speed
OEM Lab Insight:
ZoomX has the highest energy return on the market, but CloudTec delivers a more controlled, centered ride.
Building your own activewear or footwear line?
👉 https://fukigymwear.com
Q1: Are On shoes faster than Nike?
No—Nike’s ZoomX racing line is still faster.
Q2: Is On better for daily training?
Many runners prefer On for its stability and firmer feel.
Q3: Which brand lasts longer?
On tends to have more durable outsoles; Nike’s durability varies.
Q4: Are On shoes good for beginners?
Yes, especially for those who prefer a balanced, supportive ride.